Students using CodeGrade to receive instant automated feedback on R programming assignments at Wageningen University
May 6, 2025

Automatic Submission Testing for R Programming: A Project from Wageningen University

In 30 seconds...

What if grading R assignments could be faster, more consistent, and actually help students learn better? At Wageningen University, Dr. Dainius Masiliūnas put this to the test—literally—by building an automated submission system with CodeGrade.

If you’ve ever felt overwhelmed trying to give students meaningful feedback in a programming course, especially as class sizes grow, you’re not alone. Timely, consistent grading is tough to maintain when you’re juggling dozens or even hundreds of submissions. That’s exactly the challenge Dr. Dainius Masiliūnas from Wageningen University set out to address in a recent research project on automatic student submission testing using CodeGrade.

This wasn’t just an experiment in convenience. It was a deep dive into how automated testing could change the way we teach programming, from how fast students get feedback to how reliably we catch bugs, and even how we design courses for long-term sustainability. If you’ve been considering integrating more automation into your course, the findings here might give you a helpful roadmap.

Why the Research Happened

Programming education depends heavily on feedback loops. But as Dr. Masiliūnas saw in his own Geoscripting course, manually grading every submission simply doesn’t scale. There were long delays between student work and instructor feedback, inconsistent evaluations between graders, and major time sinks just to set up grading environments—particularly for assignments in R.

The goal of the research was to find out whether automatic testing, set up through CodeGrade, could solve these bottlenecks while still keeping students engaged and learning effectively.

Setting Up Smart Autotesting for R

The research team started by extending CodeGrade’s autotest features—which work well for Python—to support R. That turned out to be more complex than expected. A typical R environment setup involves installing about fifteen packages, which originally took around twenty minutes per virtual machine.

To speed things up, they made use of a custom package repository called r2u, hosting all the necessary packages and dependencies in one place. Once this was in place, environment setup dropped to less than thirty seconds. Every time a student pushed their code, a fresh VM loaded instantly, ran the test suite, and delivered feedback through CodeGrade—no manual setup required.

Give students feedback in an instant.

Continue reading

What's happening with GitHub Classroom?

GitHub Classroom updates have slowed and GitHub now points instructors to Codio. Here's what has actually changed in 2026, what professors are reporting, and what it means for your fall planning.

Best Paid Autograders for University Programming Courses (2026)

A side-by-side comparison of the best paid autograders for university programming courses in 2026 — CodeGrade, Gradescope, Codio, and Vocareum — covering pricing, features, and LMS integration.

Best Autograders for University Programming Courses You Can Start Using for Free (2026)

A practical comparison of six free autograders for university programming courses in 2026 — including CodeGrade, GitHub Classroom, Gradescope, Autograder.io, Otter Grader, and nbgrader.

Sign up to our newsletter